"RTP Payload Format for H.264 RCDO Video", Tom Kristensen, 9-Mar-09. ( bytes)
下载地址:http://www.rosoo.net/Files/UpFiles/DevMedia/Protocol/draft-ietf-avt-rtp-h264-rcdo-02.txt
This memo describes an RTP Payload format for the Reduced-Complexity Decoding Operation (RCDO) for H.264 Baseline profile bitstreams, as specified in H.241. RCDO reduces the decoding cost and resource consumption of the video processing. The RTP Payload format is based on the description in RFC 3984.
Audio/Video Transport WG T. Kristensen
Internet-Draft TANDBERG
Intended status: Standards Track March 9, 2009
Expires: September 10, 2009
RTP Payload Format for H.264 RCDO Video
draft-ietf-avt-rtp-h264-rcdo-02
Status of this Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted to IETF in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that
other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-
Drafts.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt.
The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html.
This Internet-Draft will expire on September 10, 2009.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2009 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust''''''''s Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents in effect on the date of
publication of this document (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info).
Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights
and restrictions with respect to this document.
Abstract
This memo describes an RTP Payload format for the Reduced-Complexity
Decoding Operation (RCDO) for H.264 Baseline profile bitstreams, as
specified in H.241. RCDO reduces the decoding cost and resource
consumption of the video processing. The RTP Payload format is based
on the description in RFC 3984.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2. Conventions, Definitions and Acronyms . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
3. Media Format Background . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
4. Payload Format . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
4.1. RTP Header Usage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
4.2. Payload Header . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
5. Payload Examples . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
6. Congestion Control Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
7. Payload Format Parameters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
7.1. Media Type Definition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
8. Mapping to SDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
8.1. Offer/Answer Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
8.2. Declarative SDP Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
9. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
10. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
11. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
12. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
12.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
12.2. Informative references . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
Author''''''''s Address . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
(IETF) |